Faelar wrote:Yup they will just go lower and lower in price until they are worth as much as the small tcgs.
Another fun fact: EST/cub are now more common than the small tcg pets (Puffer, Grell). As of late July anyway, which is the last time I could check (RIP UJ).
Solana wrote:I can read between the lines, however, I cannot understand why they are allowing this to continue especially when specific players are being reported. I've seen people receive bans for lesser offenses. It just seems as though it would be in their best interest to enforce their own terms of service.
My best guess is this:
When they made pets cageable, they didn't think ahead enough. There's no indication that there's any unique identifier associated with caged pets. I honestly doubt that Bliz can tell the difference between a dupe and a legit pet any better than we can. Without being able to tell for certain, I think their policy is not to ban sellers unless there is an overwhelming likelihood that they're nefarious (e.g. lvl 1, no achieves, dozens of TCG pets and no other valuable items, foreign IP, trial account, whatever). Otherwise they run the risk of banning legit accounts who purchased duped pets in good faith, and that's not worth the PR fallout.
It's noteworthy that the TCG mounts (Reins of the spectral tiger/swift spectral tiger) are still 500k+ and have very low population numbers (~30 or less across US AHs, generally). There is clearly some security built in to these items that prevents duping or makes the items unsellable or immediately detectable, and this security is clearly not built in to caged pets.
TCG pets were sold by a 3rd party company in the first place, which has since cut ties with Blizz, and anyway they have already been sold. Bliz has no financial interest in stopping the duping -- only a PR interest, in terms of maintaining confidence of the playerbase. Looking at the WoW forums, I very rarely see complaints from people whose TCG pets collapsed in value. But if they started banning people for reselling duped pets, or confiscated dupes from legit accounts, can you imagine the fallout? Realistically, what are the chances that a cub or EST bought in the past year is legit? I would get a ban for sure, and I bet many other users here would too.
So basically, I think they've chosen the lesser of two evils. I think they should have worked harder on the implementation when they decided to make pets cageable, but the ship has sailed, and the consequences are pretty much inevitable.