Quality non-battle pets
- Elmarc
- Posts:62
- Joined:November 22nd, 2010
- Pet Score:10302
- BattleTag®:Elmarc#2151
- Realm:Azjol-Nerub-eu
- Contact:
Is there a possibility to manually upgrade pets to rare quality? I haven't been able to find one and since the latest patch the non battle pets are all considered as uncommon on this site. Maybe implement this, if possible I have only 2 non-battle pets left to upgrade out of the 10-ish. But they are all showing as uncommon here. If there is a way to get it right, please let me know Thanks for the awesome site!
- Maizing
- Posts:376
- Joined:October 15th, 2012
- Pet Score:5724
- BattleTag®:Maizing#1456
- Realm:Feathermoon-us
- Contact:
Re: Quality non-battle pets
I don't think so. This site pulls the pet rarity from the armory... which does not show the quality of non-battle pets.
...and, thinking about it, if it were possible to manually input the quality of those pets, that could lead to potential cheating as there would be no way to verify that the pets in question had actually been upgraded.
...and, thinking about it, if it were possible to manually input the quality of those pets, that could lead to potential cheating as there would be no way to verify that the pets in question had actually been upgraded.
- Tahsfenz
- Posts:1138
- Joined:October 12th, 2012
- Pet Score:3920
- BattleTag®:Tahsfenz#1414
- Realm:Moon Guard-us
- Contact:
Re: Quality non-battle pets
Unless those were removed from the scoring consideration or have their weights equalized somewhere so that abuse can not happen.Maizing wrote:I don't think so. This site pulls the pet rarity from the armory... which does not show the quality of non-battle pets.
...and, thinking about it, if it were possible to manually input the quality of those pets, that could lead to potential cheating as there would be no way to verify that the pets in question had actually been upgraded.
- Maizing
- Posts:376
- Joined:October 15th, 2012
- Pet Score:5724
- BattleTag®:Maizing#1456
- Realm:Feathermoon-us
- Contact:
Re: Quality non-battle pets
Yeah. Personally, I wish that all non-battle pets were made rares by Blizzard in the first place... the way the Darkmoon Balloon is. What, after all, is the point to having a rarity value on pets whose rarity does not really make any difference?Tahsfenz wrote:Unless those were removed from the scoring consideration or have their weights equalized somewhere so that abuse can not happen.Maizing wrote:I don't think so. This site pulls the pet rarity from the armory... which does not show the quality of non-battle pets.
...and, thinking about it, if it were possible to manually input the quality of those pets, that could lead to potential cheating as there would be no way to verify that the pets in question had actually been upgraded.
Re: Quality non-battle pets
This ^Maizing wrote:I don't think so. This site pulls the pet rarity from the armory... which does not show the quality of non-battle pets.
...and, thinking about it, if it were possible to manually input the quality of those pets, that could lead to potential cheating as there would be no way to verify that the pets in question had actually been upgraded.
We used to allow manual collection tracking and we dealt with a constant barrage of "false collection" reports. We have no intention to go back to that. So let's all push for Blizzard to correct this on their end.
Re: Quality non-battle pets
I wish I knew this before I wasted a humanoid battle stone on my argent squire
Breanni wrote:This ^Maizing wrote:I don't think so. This site pulls the pet rarity from the armory... which does not show the quality of non-battle pets.
...and, thinking about it, if it were possible to manually input the quality of those pets, that could lead to potential cheating as there would be no way to verify that the pets in question had actually been upgraded.
We used to allow manual collection tracking and we dealt with a constant barrage of "false collection" reports. We have no intention to go back to that. So let's all push for Blizzard to correct this on their end.