Any thoughts?
(Yes, I'm sure I'm over thinking this.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
EDIT: Also, I don't think moths are particularly awesome for PVP. So, great PVE battlers but only *okay* PVP battlers. I have no idea how to rate this.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
I think that would just make everything really bulky. I do like the thought though! But for battling, there is quite a bit of overlap, so hopefully it won't be that much of an issue.Iamwhatis wrote:Interesting. Maybe we need 3 scores? Looks, PVP and PVE.
I like it. So if the pet is primarily a pvp pet it gets rated on how good it is in pvp and if it’s a pve pet it gets rated at how good it is in pve.Shagina wrote:Personally I choose which purpose I use the pet for and rate it based on that.
All the numbers will eventually average out. Some people will love a pet, some totally despise it. But after a bunch of votes, you will start to see a trend and hopefully one that most people agree with.Iamwhatis wrote:Community Question: What if the pet is really never used in pvp or pve are you comfortable giving it a zero star rating or is there some minimum you never go below?